Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(9): 1746-1749, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067708

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate chest radiography findings in suspected coronavirus disease-2019 patients in a tertiary care setting. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data of coronavirus disease-2019 cases admitted to the tertiary care centre from March 1 to March 30, 2020. A predesigned proforma was used to gather data, including demographics, like age and gender, co-morbidities, presenting symptoms and chest radiography findings during the admission. Length of stay and mortality were the outcome measures. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 154 suspected cases, 46(29.8%) tested positive for coronavirus disease-2019; 29(63%) males and 17(37%) females with a mean age of 50.7±19.1 years. Abnormal chest radiography was noted in 25(54.3%) cases, with bilateral pulmonary infiltrates being the most common finding 19(41.3%). Mortality was the outcome in 7(28%) of these cases, and the mean length of hospital stay was 9.3±7.3 days. Abnormal chest radiography findings were associated with an increased risk of mortality (p=0.009) and a longer hospital stay (p=0.017). Conclusion: Abnormal chest radiography findings were frequently seen in coronavirus disease-2019 patients and were also associated with increased risk of mortality and prolonged hospital stay.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Male , Female , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , X-Rays , Radiography , Radiography, Thoracic
2.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 34(1): 24-30, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1812233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Though various computerized tomography (CT) severity scores have been described for risk prognostication for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most are challenging to calculate and have variable inter-observer agreement. The objective of this study was to develop a simple CT severity score (CT-SS) with good inter-observer agreement and assess its correlation with clinical outcome. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), from April-August 2020. All patients who were PCR positive for COVID-19 and underwent CT chest examination at AKUH were included. Severity of disease was described on the basis of a 10-point CT severity score (CT-SS) devised at our institution. CT-SS were categorized as Low (0-7) and High (8-10). Inter-observer reliability between radiologist and COVID-19 intensivist was assessed using the Kappa statistic. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included, the majority male (58.9%) with mean age 55.8±13.93 years. The CT-SS rated on 0-10 showed substantial inter-observer reliability between radiologist and intensivist with a Kappa statistic of 0.78. Patients with CT-SS 8-10 had a significantly higher ICU admission & intubation rate (53.8% vs. 23.5%) and mortality rate (35.9% vs. 11.8%; p=0.017), as compared to those with CT-SS 0-7. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the described CT severity score (CT-SS) is a quick, effective, and easily reproducible tool for prediction of adverse clinical outcome in patients with COVID 19 pneumonia. The tool shows good inter-observer agreement when calculated by radiologist and physician independently.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(2): 305-311, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1761743

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess epidemiological, clinical, and radiological characteristics of the coronavirus disease in children and adults. METHODS: The scoping review comprised search on PubMed and Scopus Cochrane databases from January 2020 to April 2021 for English-language articles dealing with clinical and radiological manifestations amongst children and adults affected by coronavirus disease. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts. RESULTS: Of the 389 studies initially identified, 39(10%) were reviewed in detail. Data suggested that children were less frequently affected by the coronavirus disease. The affected children showed milder disease with low case fatalities compared to the adults. CONCLUSIONS: There exists significant gaps in knowledge of clinical and radiological aspects of coronavirus disease, but the available scientific data showed that the disease seems to be unusual in children.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Child , Delivery of Health Care , Humans
4.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0244886, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059976

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: While chest x-rays (CXRs) represent a cost-effective imaging modality for developing countries like Pakistan, their utility for the prognostication of COVID-19 has been minimally explored. Thus, we describe the frequency and distribution of CXR findings, and their association with clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: All adult (≥ 18 years) patients presenting between 28th February-31st May to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan, who were COVID-19 positive on RT-PCR with CXR done on presentation, were included. A CXR Severity Score (CXR-SS) of 0-8 was used to quantify the extent of pulmonary infection on CXR, with a score of 0 being negative and 1-8 being positive. The patients' initial CXR-SS and their highest CXR-SS over the hospital course were used for analysis, with cut-offs of 0-4 and 5-8 being used to assess association with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients, with 76.7% males and mean age 56.1 years, were included in this study. Initial CXR was positive in 80% of patients, and 30.7% of patients had an initial CXR-SS between 5-8. The mortality rate was 16.7% and 30.6% patients underwent ICU admission with intubation (ICU-Int). On multivariable analysis, initial CXR-SS (1.355 [1.136-1.616]) and highest CXR-SS (1.390 [1.143-1.690]) were predictors of ICU-Int, and ICU-Int was independently associated with both initial CXR-SS 5-8 (2.532 [1.109-5.782]) and highest CXR-SS 5-8 (3.386 [1.405-8.159]). Lastly, age (1.060 [1.009-1.113]), initial CXR-SS (1.278 [1.010-1.617]) and ICU-Int (5.047 [1.731-14.710]), were found to be independent predictors of mortality in our patients. CONCLUSION: In a resource-constrained country like Pakistan, CXRs may have valuable prognostic utility in predicting ICU admission and mortality. Additional research with larger patient samples is needed to further explore the association of CXR findings with clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Length of Stay , Lung/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pakistan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL